The board of directors of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill will hold a special meeting on Wednesday and will reportedly vote on the tenure of journalists Nicole Hannah-Jones.
The board’s announcement on the special meeting on Monday did not include details of the agenda. But to quote the words of two trustees who did not want to be named, NC Policy Observation Report The board of directors will vote on the term of Hannah-Jones.
Lamar Richards, the chairman of the Chapel Hill Student Union, is therefore the trustee of course, petition The board of directors held a special meeting last week to discuss the Hannah-Jones case. He needs similar requests from five other board members to force such a meeting, but it is not clear whether this is the reason for the meeting. The chairman of the board of directors can convene a special meeting at any time.
According to reports, compared with its previous position on the Hannah-Jones case, the board is eager to vote before Thursday. At that time, six trustees, including the chairman of the board of directors Richard Stevens (Richard Stevens), will withdraw from the board of directors, and a new group of trustees will join.
Before this week, the board’s position on the Hannah Jones case was that it barely said public statements.Multiple faculty Always hope The new board iteration will deal with Hannah Jones’ case at the first scheduled meeting on July 14.
Why is the board suddenly interested in Hannah-Jones’s tenure bid? On Monday, faculty and staff put forward some background theories, including the board’s hope that Hannah Jones would eventually decide to teach elsewhere, and that the term granted to her would only repair some of the damage it caused. Another situation is that the trustees who most oppose Hannah-Jones’s tenure vote can block her bid while they still have a chance. These are just guesses. Hannah-Jones did not say whether she would teach at Chapel Hill, only that she would not join the faculty as planned on July 1st, and that she would not do so at all if there is no term.
Hannah-Jones’s legal team revealed last week that she had won a UNC faculty position and promised to get her tenure and scheduled start date in January this year, but the board of directors twice refused to vote on her tenure. She accepted a non-tenured position in February, and then she understood why the board of directors would do this.
Again, publicly, the board of directors has Less talk As for why it refused to vote on Hannah Jones’ tenure, it’s just that sometimes members have questions about professors from non-traditional academic backgrounds. However, there is widespread suspicion, even confirmed by trustees who spoke anonymously, that the board cares more about what Hannah Jones wrote than what is on her resume.
Hannah-Jones is not a typical scholar because she does not have a final degree, but she has a master’s degree in journalism in Chapel Hill and has received almost all major honors in her field. In addition, all the people who Hannah Jones will serve as the Cavaliers chairperson have immediately received their tenure, and they are not from a traditional academic background; journalism is a field where expertise is built from practical experience.
A more likely explanation for the behavior of the board of directors is Hanna-Jones’s “Project 1619”, New York Times Magazine, Has become political football, and has demonstrated in some heated debates A The role of critical racial theory In terms of public education. Hannah-Jones said that “1619” tried to readjust the role of black Americans in American history, but many conservatives, including former President Trump, said it was unpatriotic and focused too much on racism.
Especially in North Carolina, the Carolina Reform Partnership calls Hannah Jones “a radical journalist—not a teacher.” The James G. Martin Academic Update Center asked: “Given Hannah-Jones’s questionable qualifications, how did she get hired by North Carolina’s flagship research university? The most likely explanation is irresponsible faculty and administrative staff. The administrative decision to hire her was made without any involvement of the university’s board of directors.”
The Martin Center believes that the trustee has the right to intervene in tenure cases, which is technically true. But in almost every other tenure case it has ever considered, the board respected the advice of many expert teachers and administrative examiners. As a result, the board’s postponement of Hannah-Jones’s faculty and administration-supported tenure case is very different from how Chapel Hill and the entire academic community operate.
Major donors to the UNC School of Journalism are also Lobby against The appointment of Hannah-Jones implies that her work is too controversial.But historians at UNC and elsewhere have already Counterattack Hannah-Jones successfully challenged the hypothesis of the entire field.Every reporter has Point out Hannah-Jones’s special name is Ida “Bae” Wells. He is one of a long list of black journalists who must be activists to promote the country into a more genuine democracy.
There have been many protests and other demonstrations in support of Hannah Jones last month, including Friday assembly During this period, the students talked about their dissatisfaction with the racial atmosphere of the campus and held up signs that read “1619…2021. The same struggle” and “I can give you 1,619 why Hannah Jones should be for life.” Reason for appointment.”
Hundreds of faculty and staff have signed a draft letter to the chairman of the board of directors Stevens, who said: “The board’s denial of inaction is an appointment proposal for the university and its faculty and staff to be properly, widely documented and considered Reversal, and no reason is provided, and there is no obvious reason.”
The letter stated that this “appropriate intervention by the board of directors in the scope of teachers’ powers puts the basic assumptions of academic freedom, free knowledge exploration, and integrity at risk.” “These assumptions are the basis for the long-term reputation of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the reputation of American colleges and universities on a global scale. They are untenable.”