Sports

No-hitter and Faye Vincent: How the historical definition of no-hitter was shaped in 1990

[ad_1]

The Cubs defeated the seventh no hitter of Major League Baseball’s 2021 season on Thursday night. This is a joint effort that requires four different pitchers to fight the dangerous Dodgers lineup. This season is now tied with 1990, 1991, 2012, 2015 and 2021 on the list of the “most official no hits in a single season”.

However, when the 1990 season ended, the official number for that year was nine. At the time, this was an unreachable record. The previous markings were six in a year, in 1908, 1915, 1917, and 1969. So what made the two no-hitters disappear from the “official” no-hitter list? A large number of no hits in history led to conversations in the league office.

“The one who worked for us handled all the baseball rules and regulations. He came to me and said,’We have a problem in defining what a no-hitter is,'” then MLB Commissioner Fei Vincent told Sports News this season Earlier, Corey Kluber was interviewed by telephone the next day without a hit. “He said,’I think we should get together to make some decisions and clean up some of them. I said’very good’.”

The two no-hitters in 1990, for example, were unconventional. Melido Perez had no hits in six innings-the last three innings were washed away by rain-Andy Hawkins had no hits in eight innings. In that bizzaro baseball game, the combination of turnovers and positions at the bottom of the eighth inning allowed the Chicago team to score four times, and the game ended when the visiting Yankees failed to score at the top of the ninth inning. The hosts, the White Sox, won 4-0, despite not being hit.

“Everyone is saying,’Well, they are not special anymore,'” said Dirk Lammers, who runs this indispensable website. nonohitters.com with Wrote a book on this topic, published in 2016 “It’s kind of like the way everyone is talking this year. Does it matter if you throw a no-hitter now? Everyone is doing this.”

It is worth noting that no hitters were thrown in 1989, so no hits for fast shooting seemed very extreme. The other no-hitter players in 1990 are: Mark Langston (7 innings) and Mike Waite (2 innings), Randy Johnson, Nolan Ryan, Dave Stewart and Fernando Valenzuela (same day! ), Terry Mulholland and Dave Steve.

So Vincent established a statistical accuracy committee.

Vincent said: “The committee is really there to clean up any ambiguities based on the existing definition rules.” “Steve Greenberg is my deputy and he played a role.”

Committee Announced its decision in early September 1991 Two major rules: To become an official no-hitter, the game must go through at least nine rounds; to become an official no-hitter, the game must end without allowing any hits.

So Perez and Hawkins lost their “official” status as no-hitters. They are not alone. Harvey Haddix was also removed from the list, although this may be the most impressive game ever. In 1959, Hardicks pitched 12 perfect rounds for the Buccaneers, but this perfect match failed due to a defensive error in the 13th round, and then after a sacrifice of short play and Hank Allen’s deliberate walk, Joe · Adcock hit an off-court home run.

Because that game did not end with zero in the batting sequence, it is no longer considered an official no-hitter. A few years after the committee’s decision, Pedro Martinez pitched nine perfect rounds in 1995, allowing only a double lead in the 10th round. There are no taboos for future Hall of Fame members. A total of 56 games were eligible for official no-hitters under the old definition, but no longer entered the official list.

“I think, like most things in baseball, the standard should be very, very high,” Vincent said. “I think we did the right thing. I think there is a lot to say. I don’t think the last two games are irrelevant. I think the performance of the seven games is very special, but in my life, I can’t tell you I How many times have I watched, in the eighth or ninth inning, someone hits the ball and the person who hasn’t hit the ball goes out the window.”

Imagining what the reaction to such a decision might be in today’s social media environment, I asked Vincent his recollection of his reaction to the committee’s ruling.

“There is no real major disagreement. The New York Times’s Murray Chas, I remember some other people, were very excited because they did not agree with the ruling we made,” Vincent said. “I respect him, I respect his views. But I remember Bart Giammati once said, “Those debates are really great, because they gave birth to the Hot Stove League. People like to sit there and argue about what is real in the winter when there is nothing to do. No-hitters and all these things. I think Bart is right. They are harmless and people really like to argue about them. I think a lot of fans are really tired of it all. They think it’s as boring as a lawyer.”

Chase’s Matt Young in Boston wrote after eight no-hitters in an away loss in 1992, he wrote that he was not stingy in his New York Times column.

“In fact, Commissioner Fay Vincent affectionately and resolutely maintained the correct use of language, and was able to use words such as otiose, lapidary and recondite.

So why did he let his committee members go astray on “no hits”? This seems to be a fairly simple term that means no hit. Why would anyone have trouble with this concept? “

As you know, in 2021, conversations about no-hitters are more than just words in English.

Now, the double-headed game is scheduled for seven rounds, which means that it is not enough to just throw the specified number of rounds and not allow the ball to be hit. In order to meet the official no-hitter standard, the pitcher (or team, working together like the Cubs’ recent gems) must complete two additional games-the eighth and the ninth-and no hits are allowed. Oh, they must let the base runners start every game at second base.

Yes, seven games and magic runners complicate matters.

“The development of baseball has made statistical comparisons and definitions more difficult,” Vincent said. “I don’t know what to do. I really don’t like the rules.”

The truth is here, As i wrote before . Getting 21 outs without a batting is not the same as getting 27 outs without a hit. This is not the case, it is foolish to pretend that they are the same achievement. At this point, I fully support Vincent. On the other hand, Madison Bumgarner was only allowed to play seven games. Is it Madison Bumgarner’s fault? No, of course not.

The solution seems simple: create a second “official” list for non-traditional no-hitters. Celebrate their amazing achievements-they do-without departing from the traditional official no-hitters. Vincent said he agreed with the idea.

“If you want to call them all no-hitters, then go ahead,” he said. “If you want to call a seven-game match a no-hitter match, go ahead. It makes it difficult for them to compare.”

So let’s go back to the question posed in 1990 and ask it again in 2021: Does it still seem to matter when everyone throws no hits?

“Oh, I think so,” Lammers said. “No hitters are so random, I don’t think you can say This This is why it happened. Pitching is very good now, but there is still a loop that will mess up the no-hitter. This will happen in any game, no matter how good the pitcher is. “

For the baseball-loving public, it is still important, too.

“As long as someone enters the fifth or sixth inning, I will be promoted on the website,” Lammers said. “When someone doesn’t hit the ball, it jumps up and then slowly comes down. This year is crazy. Every time the traffic drops to a normal level, we get another situation that reaches the seventh inning and then returns to normal. .”



[ad_2]

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button